System Design Article

Batch vs Stream Processing (Lambda/Kappa)

Difficulty: Hard

Batch processing computes results over a finite, bounded dataset. Stream processing computes results continuously over an unbounded, ever-arriving dataset. The two paradigms have different latency, cost, correctness, and operational profiles, and choosing wrong is one of the most expensive architectural mistakes a senior engineer can make. This lesson covers the mental model (bounded vs unbounded data, event time vs processing time, watermarks, windows), the two classical reference architectures (Lambda and Kappa), the modern unified models (Beam, Flink), and the production realities of exactly-once semantics, late data, replays, and operational complexity. The goal is to leave you able to choose batch, streaming, or a hybrid for any system, and to defend the choice in an interview.

System Design
/

Batch vs Stream Processing (Lambda/Kappa)

Batch vs Stream Processing (Lambda/Kappa)

Batch processing computes results over a finite, bounded dataset. Stream processing computes results continuously over an unbounded, ever-arriving dataset. The two paradigms have different latency, cost, correctness, and operational profiles, and choosing wrong is one of the most expensive architectural mistakes a senior engineer can make. This lesson covers the mental model (bounded vs unbounded data, event time vs processing time, watermarks, windows), the two classical reference architectures (Lambda and Kappa), the modern unified models (Beam, Flink), and the production realities of exactly-once semantics, late data, replays, and operational complexity. The goal is to leave you able to choose batch, streaming, or a hybrid for any system, and to defend the choice in an interview.

System Design
Hard
stream-processing
batch-processing
lambda-architecture
kappa-architecture
system-design
advanced
premium
data-intensive-systems

449 views

4

This system design article is available for premium members only.

Upgrade to Premium