AI Engineering
/

Evaluation & Observability

Evaluation & Observability

Measure quality, investigate failures, and gate releases.

Start topic

Separate retrieval, packing, and generation failures, build a small scored evaluation set, and design release gates that account for slices and uncertainty.

3 questions

Questions

Easy

Easy
Conceptual

1.5 h

Use a request trace to tell retrieval, context-packing, and generation failures apart, and report answer quality with a named denominator next to operational signals.

Medium

Medium
Hands-on

3 h

Score a six-case evaluation set with a deterministic harness, report success, coverage, and answered accuracy with named denominators, and keep missing outputs visible in the totals.

Hard

Hard
System Design

4 h

Decide whether a candidate with better aggregate success but a regressed protected slice can ship, and design a release gate with calibrated graders, traces, and stated uncertainty.

What you will be able to do

  • Define an evaluation case with observable success conditions
  • Distinguish retrieval quality from answer quality
  • Choose between deterministic checks, model graders, and human review
  • Calculate simple success rates with clear denominators
  • Explain metrics, logs, and traces, and read a trace to locate lost evidence
  • Design a small evaluation set with slices, expected behavior, and recorded label rationale
  • Implement a deterministic scoring harness for structured outcomes
  • Report task success, answer coverage, and answered accuracy with explicit denominators, overall and per slice
  • Account for errors, missing outputs, and ungraded cases without hiding them

Before you start

Suggested, not required.

Hands-on exercises

Topic boundaries

This topic measures quality and investigates failures. Production & Reliability covers running the application.

Related on CodeSnatch